Aside from the List section, where I gather most of the responses and concerns from individuals, I also created a special blog project for those who engage in conversations with me, and those that need much attention.
These are individual projects that I started from scratch. I may update them from time to time if time permits.
I have consolidated several blogs into one primary source using Cross-Origin and Same-Origin iframe, http://bustillo-family.blogspot.com. While I am discontinuing the use of http://truth-reflects.blogspot.com, all future posts will also be available there, and to those who prefer to access the content on that site. The landing page will normally be the oldest that I maintain, which is http://jerrybustillo.blogspot.com.
For an update, I made the http://truth-reflects.blogspot.com independent, which means every time you click on it from my blog, it will open in a new window. So you don't need to go through my personal blog just to see it.
For individual concerns and responses, check it on the List tab.
Updates:I decided to hide their names in this content for some reasons, such as confidentiality, privacy, hate comments, and/or name-calling, since it includes specific criticisms. If you want to view it, just click on the list below to expose or find their names. Nah! I change my mind, it turns out that it need much work on doing such, and of course, it is not a sponsored blog and I don't make this for monetization and I don't ask for donations either. So, there you go, everything is on the list. Sorted from A-Z so you can easily check out your Name or your Dummy Name if you're using one.
About this Blog: This blog is dedicated to the members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to our Ward and Stake, and to my Families (Bustillo and Nu帽ez).
It is not sponsored or affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or any specific ward or branch, nor is it affiliated with the stake either; rather, it is my personal collection of information, journal entries, family stories, music, pictures, videos, hobbies, games, and a lot more. The topics and principles discussed may or may not originate from official Church sources; however, my opinions are mine and not to be considered official doctrine.
For more of my Blog Collection. Check out http://jerrybustillo.blogspot.com Any suggestions are welcome! Feel free to contact me or use the comment form somewhere in this blog; hopefully, I can add it sooner. Below is a list of antagonists and links to my responses. You can also find links on my latest commentaries and responses below.
Thank you for your time. God bless you all and Have a nice day!
“The fundamental principles of our religion are the testimony of the Apostles and Prophets, concerning Jesus Christ, that He died, was buried, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven. - Joseph Smith Jr.”
And here's a funny mental gymnast of our INC's friendly neighborhood Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. Thinking this was the teachings of the LDS without knowing, he was fooled by someone whom he didn't know, and guess what, he took the bait. LOL! Nice try, Jose!
The teaching of the members of MORMON-LDS are confusing.
Really, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? How confused are you, Jose? Or more accurately, how much do you know about the LDS teaching VS your own ideology from Manalo's Church? You can't even provide evidence of any claim from your Manalo teachings that it was true; you just keep on running and jumping on different topics to just simply call out attention. We understand that you have a mental issue or Histrionic Personality Disorder, but please don't use it around just to act like an idiot.
So let's go over to your program -
They do not belongs to God 100% sure.
Seriously, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Just how do you elaborate on your Straw Man argument without even a position? You lack a ground to stand on your claim by simply copy-pasting verses that you don't even know the context. Do I really need to educate you over and over with your senseless argument?
1 Corinthians 14:33 - King James Version
33 For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
The Above verse has nothing to do with his argument, so it's just simply a copy-paste fail.
They belongs to their father the inventor of lie.
Still lacks a position. You can't even provide evidence of your claim. That same argument can easily be thrown back to your Felix Manalo, the Father of the INC of the Philippines Cult, that lie for fame and money. So what about that Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?
John 8:44 - Complete Jewish Bible
44 You belong to your father, Satan, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. From the start he was a murderer, and he has never stood by the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he tells a lie, he is speaking in character; because he is a liar — indeed, the inventor of the lie!
The Above verse has nothing to do with his argument, so it's just simply a copy-paste fail.
The saying of apostle Paul fulfilled to them.
Again, you have zero standing to make a claim; that is simply a Straw Man Argument, and you have no position on that claim. This can easily apply to you and your religion. Stop making a claim without understanding the real argument or issue, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata.
1 Timothy 1:7 - Easy-to-Read Version
7 They want to be teachers of the law,[a] but they don’t know what they are talking about. They don’t even understand the things they say they are sure of.
Paul's epistle to Timothy, where he tries to help him open up the Ephesian teachers who were corrupt and misguided, or lacking understanding. So this simply doesn't say anything about Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's argument, rather another failed Copy-paste text from his Skill without understanding the context.
And a shout-out to those people who have been called out in this senseless argument. Welcome to Iglesia Ni Christo (The Church of Man Christ)!
Jerry Nu帽ez Bustillo Marites Palos Salinas Paul Henrie Robert Gurr Vicente de la Paz Ocsar Daniel Bahena Danilo Zuasola Pax Samoana Vernon Mancer Roy Adams
Actual post that he posted on his wall, and to call out whoever he wants to satisfy his craving for attention.
A screenshot that has been added to his post, without knowing the people who commented, it already answers his confusion.
A funny comment that I made to help him that he had been duped by someone.
From the Screenshot that I pointed out, this is just simply trolling, or maybe he is just making this post for fun, and Jose Rodelio Retome Rata didn't realize that these people who commented already told him not to take the bait, but Jose Rodelio Retome Rata (aka Rebuker), didn't. Of course, he's an idiot.
Yeah sure. So here's my presentation below, and tell me how you understand it, Jose.
Does the Church teach that Joseph Smith was already resurrected?
Straight answer, NO! And nowhere in his comment did he even say that it was a resurrected Joseph Smith. Just maybe a spiritual experience, which I don't disagree with, which might posibly be happen to anyone for some reason which we do not know as of this moment. But for sure it is not a resurrected being, and I don't even think it was Joseph Smith either, maybe he or she was convinced by their own experience that had added light on their testimonies, but rest assured, the church did not teach anything about resurrected saints like Joseph or some others in later times. There were others like Mose, Elijah, etc appears to Joseph Smith, but that's a different topic. So, no, Jose, you simply misunderstood the statement, combining it with your little mental capacity. LOL!
To summarize it for you, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata - Scripture is clear that resurrection occurs according to God’s order, not personal claims or assumptions, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata
"Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. 1 Corinthians 15:23"
Even if someone claims a spiritual experience, that does not automatically mean the appearance of a resurrected person.
"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God. - 1 John 4:1"
Spiritual Conception, visions, or personal experiences may occur, but they must not be exaggerated into doctrine, especially when the Church itself has never taught such a thing. And again, Jose. It is true, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, that Moses and Elijah appeared in sacred contexts (Matthew 17:3; Doctrine & Covenants 110). However, these appearances were exceptional, divinely purposed events and not a model for interpreting modern claims or personal stories. They do not justify assuming that Joseph Smith, or anyone else, has already been resurrected. That is never taught, so stop assuming that you know everything while you don't, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. The Church has never taught that resurrected saints are regularly appearing in modern times, nor that Joseph Smith is among them. Any claim suggesting otherwise is a personal interpretation, not LDS doctrine. But a new revelation never contradicts established doctrine unless it is necessarily needed to be changed as God permits.
"We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things…” - Articles of Faith 1:9"
This is Funny, I thought it was in the Philippines, but it seems like an Indian INC. LOL
Same Old tricks Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. And still same old running after it was debunked.
Here Jose Rodelio Retome Rata made a clear statement as one of the excuse about Christ won't show to anyone since it is a question to Felix Manalo's authority and his self-proclaim that he was the Prophet or Sugo of the Last day, but he can't prove it. So Jose Rodelio Retome Rata made a scape plan to avoid the issue. The problem is; did the scripture really translate it that way or was it just he is using it without understanding the context? Let's find out -
Hebrews 10:10-13 King James Version
10 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
11 And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:
12 But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God;
13 From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool.
The teaching of the Bible Jesus ascended ONCE into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God. Since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool.
Does Hebrews 10:10-13 said anything about his coming the second time? Or was it all about the atonement man to finish the works of the Law? Take note Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, we do believe and accept the teaching about Christ as the last sacrifice to end the laws, no question to it. But this has nothing to do of his second coming or even to continue the work of salvation and continues revelation. Seems like you don't know what scriptures you need to quote to justify Felix Manalo's self-proclaimed prophecy.
Acts 3:20-21 King James Version
20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:
21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
Jesus hasn't come down yet for the second time.
We understand you, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; but this has nothing to do with your claim. This was all about the restitution of all things that will soon be fulfilled, we normally call it restoration. This is not all about the second coming issue, or rather the first vision issue, nothing at all. So to me, you just keep looking up random words just to make up something to help your Felix Manalo avoid the issue of his calling that he cannot sustain. Again, this is just a random Joke of your arrogant bigotry.
Hebrews 9:28 King James Version
28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.
The teaching of the LDS church from the made up fairy book of their prophet after Jesus resurrection he descended from heaven to the ancient America and ascended again into heaven.
And what this has to do with the claim that Christ Appears in Ancient America. And it seems like your word play game still lacks its ground to support it, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. Hebrews 9:29 is once again as understood clearly was his atonement for all right after he performs it, and we do believe he will come again the second time which is obviously we call Second Coming. And thinking that he came down to America as the second coming seems obviously a lunatic view of your poor brain. No one every saw Christ in America and since he appeared there so you are counting it as second coming? Seriously Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Did your brain works that way?
You must understand Jose Rodelio Retome Rata that Christ did not just appeared once soon after his resurrection. He appeared multiple times and in different occasions. So was it all about his second coming? Of course not. But I guess you don't know that it happens in the Bible Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. I think that you just only read some lines and keep it as the perfect doctrine of your bigoted study of INC religion. That's not gonna work, Jose. Here's some of the list below, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata so you'll get to know your Bible -
John 20:14-18 - To Mary Magdalene.
Luke 24:13-35 - To two disciples on the road to Emmaus.
John 20:19-29 - To the apostles (twice, including Thomas).
1 Corinthians 15:5-8 - Appears to 500 at once.
Acts 7:55-56 - Stephen sees Jesus standing at God’s right hand (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)
Acts 9:3-6 - Appears to Paul on the road to Damascus (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)
Acts 22:17-21 - Appears again in the temple.
Revelation 1:12-18 - Appears to John (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)
Revelation 5 - Appears in heaven as the Lamb (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)
3 Nephi 11:8,12,21
8 And it came to pass, as they understood they cast their eyes up again towards heaven; and behold, they saw a Man descending out of heaven; and he was clothed in a white robe; and he came down and stood in the midst of them; and the eyes of the whole multitude were turned upon him, and they durst not open their mouths, even one to another, and wist not what it meant, for they thought it was an angel that had appeared unto them.
12 And it came to pass that when Jesus had spoken these words the whole multitude fell to the earth; for they remembered that it had been prophesied among them that Christ should show himself unto them after his ascension into heaven.
21 And the Lord said unto him: I give unto you power that ye shall baptize this people when I am again ascended into heaven.
This LDS church go against the teaching of the Bible.
No wonder why because their prophet was a false prophet trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.
Just when did this verse that you choose to pick up go against the teachings of the Bible. Go ahead and quote it, and let's discuss this one by one and let's go ahead and debate this as against Biblical records. Do you have any particular issue about this verses? It seems like you just want to keep doing that program the you promote such as copy paste program of Cherry-picking of your INC studio. Come on, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata! Go ahead and make a statement and lets get in to it if you may. You can ask one of your INC cohorts to act as moderator if you need it.
1 John 4:1 King James Version
4 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
Everyone can clearly see that Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; everyone knows what the verses was for. So do you apply that to your Philippine Prophet of the Far-East movement of Iglesia Ni Cristo? Did you understand how your Felix Manalo's self-proclaim as the prophet to restore the Philippine Religion? Do you know how many witnesses that can prove his claim as the prophet or Sugo of your Far East movement? Go ahead and educate us, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata.
Galatians 1:6-9 King James Version
6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
Again, this content was use over and over, so the question to you, Jose Rodelio Retome Rara; Do you know and understand the context? This has been explained to you over and over and yet you don't have any rebuttal on this subject. Still coward Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Now to repeat my statement about this, you should look at your scripture that this has nothing to do with your so called another Gosple such as the Book of Mormon rather it has something to do with the Judaizers who tries to convert the Gentile like the Galatians saints to the Laws that they still observe in which Paul clearly states that it is no longer necessary, and yet some of them even the apostles still observe and follow the traditions which lead them to debate the matter as found in the Acts 15. And here you are still using the same old style of cherry-picking without knowing the context. Nice try, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, you still fail.
Here we are in one of the Fun Fact that Jose Rodelio Retome Rata*** and thinking this has something to do about contradictions and of course, was it found in the Book of Mormon?
BOOK OF MORMON VS BOOK OF MORMON!
Abraham 4:3-5
3 And they (the Gods) said: Let there be light; and there was light.
4 And they (the Gods) comprehended the light, for it was bright; and they divided the light, or caused it to be divided, from the darkness.
5 And the Gods called the light Day, and the darkness they called Night. And it came to pass that from the evening until morning they called night; and from the morning until the evening they called day; and this was the first, or the beginning, of that which they called day and night.
VS
Moses 1:6
6 And I have a work for thee, Moses, my son; and thou art in the similitude of mine Only Begotten; and mine Only Begotten is and shall be the Savior, for he is full of grace and truth; but there is no God beside me, and all things are present with me, for I know them all.
Moses 2:3-5
3 And I, God, said: Let there be light; and there was light.
4 And I, God, saw the light; and that light was good. And I, God, divided the light from the darkness.
5 And I, God, called the light Day; and the darkness, I called Night; and this I did by the word of my power, and it was done as I spake; and the evening and the morning were the first day.
First of all, the Book of Mormon did not start with the seven (7) days creation that this Jose Rodelio Retome Rata*** wasn't aware about. This were not written in the Book of Mormon but rather in the Pearl of Great Price. This alone proves that he is brainless and only cherry-picks some stuff that he never study or understood the context.
To understand this misunderstood statement of Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***, let's go back to the basic Biblical Phrase at the very beginning of the Book that says this -
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. - Genesis 1:1
What's the actual Hebrew words that was written on it, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? To help you out on the answer to that question in which you don't know about, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, let's post it here -
The word 讗ֱ诇ֹ讛ִ֑讬诐 (Elohim) was addressed as plural or in a plural form. Though most trinitarian suggest that this has something to do with the trinity, The Latter-day Saints view is different. And take note, the word 讛ַ砖ָּׁ诪ַ֖讬ִ诐 (heavens) was also in plural form. So what was this all about in LDS Theology? The use of the plural form is not related to the doctrine of the Trinity, cause LDS doesn't believe that; this Plurality simply understood as the council of God as stated in Psalm 82. The Monotheistic view states that this council were simple called judges, which is a direct contradiction of Christ statement (on John 10:34-36) addressing the Jews about his existence with the Father, and eventually one of the very reasons that leads to his crucifixion. So, the question would be; was Joseph Smith right in directly using the plural word of the translation of the Book of Abraham? He does, in a sense that they were compose of Councils of heavenly beings. So, obviously, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, is clueless of his criticism about the usage of the word.
Yes it is, the Fun Fact here that you are Clueless and your study is merely just scratching the surface. Try to dig dipper Jose Rodelio Retome Rata to know more about your Bible. Thank you for taking it up
And here we are again in one of Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's False Assumption and circular Reasoning. So let's dive in to see his claim -
A false witness is punishable by God.
Okay so which witness you are referring to, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?
Proverbs 19:5 King James Version
5 A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.
The punishment is the second death which is the lake of fire.
Revelation 21:8 King James Version
8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
This is just a quote that you think might be the best stone to catch the bird Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. Question is can you prove it? And it the same stone will thrown to you, can you provide evidence of you claim witnesses on your Religion, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?
The testimony of the LDS church the Bible and the book of Mormon are two witnesses.
Ok so we already have it so what your point again?
Exodus 14:16,21 King James Version
16 But lift thou up thy rod, and stretch out thine hand over the sea, and divide it: and the children of Israel shall go on dry ground through the midst of the sea.
21 And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided.
According to the Bible Moses lift up his rod and stretched out his hand over the sea and the waters were divided.
But according to the book of Mormon Moses spoke to the waters of the Red Sea and were divided.
1 Nephi 4:2
2 Therefore let us go up; let us be strong like unto Moses; for he truly spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and they divided hither and thither, and our fathers came through, out of captivity, on dry ground, and the armies of Pharaoh did follow and were drowned in the waters of the Red Sea.
Oh really, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata!? Just because the authors has different version of presenting the notion of the story, so you automatically conclude it is false? Is that So, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Did you understand the context of each presentation Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?
We should understand the settings first before thinking something didn't happen just because of the limited account that has been recorded. Also, as I had said earlier, because of some limited text and phrases found in the bible, does it necessarily the only thing that happens that time, Jose Rodelio Retome Rate? Which I remember one time that you people try to excuse Felix authority to baptized, just because there is no record of John's Baptism? Really man!?
So why did Nephi say spake unto the waters? This is simply figurative or rhetorical language, which is common during their time in ancient Semitic-style speech. Nephi speech is not a direct quote, rather it's a motivational speech for his brethren and this doesn't directly applies at to what the exact scriptural quote did said about. You should remember Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, they don't have any record during that time and the only record was actually they are planning to obtain from someone who hold's it. So why would Nephi use a line by line quote while it isn't even the case of his address?
The book of Mormon contradicts the Bible.
The book of Mormon is a false witness.
So when did the Book of Mormon Contradict use a quote that doesn't even available during that time, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?
From Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's Screenshot that I don't even know how he understood the context.
Does everyone experience this? This is actually the Facebook account of our company, and it seems like some unknown email had been put as one of the email contact. Why and How did it happened this way? Facebook might be not the best or trustworthy option in terms of Privacy. I think this is not a glitch or maybe a program error. I think Facebook has lost control over their system as to who access their personal information, but it's my opinion though.
So here we go to one of Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's best assumptions and Critical Thinking of my very own Teaching (which I don't even know when I taught it). So let's dive in to his tiny brain -
Jerry Nu帽ez Bustillo-Here is another FUN FACT teaching of yours!
John 20:17 King James Version
17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
Screenshot from his post which I'm not even aware on their discussion thinking I have the same opinion.
Okay, so what was this all about Jose Rodelio Retome RATA***? Which part there was my teaching that you think I have taught you Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***?
According to your teaching-in that instances Jesus has not yet resurrected while he was.
John 20:1,9,16-17 King James Version
1 The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.
9 For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead.
16 Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say, Master.
17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.
Oh, really Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***? Tell me where's your proof that I teach it? And basing to someone opinion or claim generalizing it as my claim? Really Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***?
This logical fallacy simply calls Appeal to Anonymous Authority which closely related to argumentum ad verecundiam, this happens when someone like Jose Rodelio Retome Rata took the opinion of others that he is not even aware or certain to their belief or practices or maybe the content was cherry-picked , he then relates it as the general opinion or teaching of mine as he say that I teach. Which is more accurately basing his conclusion to opinions and not my actual views or my statement.
Seriously, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Ganyan ka makipag discussion? Yung basta ka nalang humugot ng kung ano-ano tapos sabihin mo turo ko? Ngee! Hangang anong level lang ba ang kaya ng utak mo, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***?
Jerry Nu帽ez Bustillo-Isn't it FUN FACT?
According to your teaching he was in spirit body that he has not yet received his perfected body while he has a body of flesh and bones which the spirit doesn't have.
Luke 24:1-9 King James Version
1 Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning, they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.
2 And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre.
3 And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus.
4 And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in shining garments:
5 And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead?
6 He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee,
7 Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again.
8 And they remembered his words,
9 And returned from the sepulchre, and told all these things unto the eleven, and to all the rest.
39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
Again, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, at wag kang magpaka-RATA***? Kailan ko ba sinabi na yan ay Accourding to "MY" teachings? Take me to the source where I said that Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***; can you provide a link about this so-called Fun Fact that I'd taught, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***?
Jerry Nu帽ez Bustillo-Isn't it FUN FACT?
Matthew 28:1,5-9 King James Version
1 In the end of the sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre.
5 And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.
6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.
7 And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him: lo, I have told you.
8 And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word.
9 And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and worshipped him.
Again Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Where is your source that I taught this opinion that I don't even knew?
How can they hold Jesus if Jesus has no perfected body?
Jerry Nu帽ez Bustillo-Isn't it FUN FACT?
And again, you have no source and you don't even know which part was he talking to Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***. It was about the appearce of Christ with Mary Magdalene not the general story, Christ clearly states that she should not touch him. So the content goes on that she was instructed to tell his apostles about his appearance. So Accourding to your presentation, no one was able to touch him during that time he appears to Mary, but he was then eventually as his instruction to his apostles to touch him. Dito palang sa kento mo Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***, sabog sabog na, ngayon gumagawa ka pa ng kwento na turo ko. Edi WOW!
